E Gaze Metrics Predictions for Garden Path Sentences
![Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “NP/Z Ambiguity with Verb Transitivity” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.](figures/appendix/A5_gpt2_npz_ambig_et.png)
Figure E.1: Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “NP/Z Ambiguity with Verb Transitivity” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.
![Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “NP/Z Ambiguity with Overt Object” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.](figures/appendix/A5_gpt2_npz_obj_et.png)
Figure E.2: Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “NP/Z Ambiguity with Overt Object” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.
![Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “MV/RR Ambiguity” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.](figures/appendix/A5_gpt2_mvrr_et.png)
Figure E.3: Average GPT2-ET gaze metrics predictions for the “MV/RR Ambiguity” SyntaxGym test suite. Bars show 95% confidence intervals. Units are in ms for durations, % for FXP, and raw counts for FXC.